Death and juxtaposition

1 minute read

Learning this morning of the death of Brittany Maynard, I surfed around on my television to get an update. The payoff would not have been much, for the details of her story are well-known, and its ending certain, save only its date. The 29 year-old Californian discovered that she had a terminal brain tumor, but also learned that its progress would be her regress; she would, bit by bit, lose her ability to function in her world and marriage. She moved to Oregon, a state that has a Death with Dignity law, where she would live her life as fully as she could, and then choose to end it when she decided she couldn’t continue, and couldn’t burden those around her more than she already had. She took her life yesterday. In a country that does not really share a common morality, and in which our economic and political momentum is carrying us in the direction of social atomism (and entropy), it may be the better part of prudence to allow individuals when afflicted by killer diseases the freedom to end their own lives on their terms. We have to live together in peace. Brittany Maynard would agree, and would have you agree, too.

My channel-surfing brought me instead to a story on ESPN’s SportsCenter about Lauren Hill, a 19 year-old woman in her freshman year of college, struggling against the same illness as Maynard: an inoperable brain tumor. Doctors have told Hill that she’ll be gone by the end of this year. But her story was all about fight. She played in a college basketball game, her life’s dream. But near as one can tell from the reporting about her, there is no plan afoot for her to take her own life, and it seems that she will spend her final days fading away in the embrace of her family.

It’s hard to say what is right or wrong about a issue like this. But I’ve not been struck like this by a juxtaposition in the news since the deaths of Princess Diana and Mother Theresa in the same week in 1997.